카테고리
미분류

VAR Explained: Arm Positions In Handball Incidents

Previous Premier League arbitrator Chris Foy gives his view on various late handball choices in the Premier League.
Arm in anticipated position
Occurrence: As Mason Greenwood and Callum Hudson-Odoi tested, the ball unmistakably hit Hudson-Odoi’s arm (see principle picture above).
Foy’s view: On first survey I thought Greenwood dealt with the ball, so I can comprehend why the on-field choice was no punishment. The VAR felt that there was adequate proof to send the ref over to look again.
Having taken a gander at the recording, the ref reasoned that Hudson-Odoi’s arm was not in an unforeseen position, given he was trying for the ball with Greenwood, and stayed with his unique on-field choice of no offense, so restarted with a dropped ball.
My view is that a punishment ought to have been granted as his arm is unmistakably expanded away from his body, and it has not come at him from closeness.
Arm not in anticipated position
Episode: Nicolas Pepe had a shot at objective and the ball struck Wilfred Ndidi’s outstretched arm.
Foy’s view: This was one of the more direct choices, whenever you have the chance to audit the recording, and generally excellent utilization of VAR.
Ndidi’s arms were unmistakably broadened away from his body as he hopped and obstructed Pepe’s shot towards objective. You need to say that his arms were not in a normal position and the VAR was right to intercede and encourage the arbitrator to take a gander at the episode once more.먹튀검증
Arm not broadened away from body
Occurrence: Roberto Firmino’s endeavored cross was obstructed by N’Golo Kante’s arm.
Foy’s view: As Firmino’s cross came in, Kante arms were up, yet critically they were not broadened away from his body. While the ball contacted his arm, the closeness and the absence of response time implies that the assumption was for play to proceed. This was the right choice in my view.
Arm expanded away from body
Occurrence: Nicolas Pepe’s endeavor to take the ball past Erik Pieters in the Burnley punishment territory was impeded by the outstretched arm of the Burnley left-back.
Foy’s view: Similar to the Kante punishment offer, the vicinity and response time were key contemplations. The distinction here was that Pieters’ arm was obviously broadened away from his body. Obviously, there is consistently an emotional component while deciding a cautious handball and, on the day, the authorities unmistakably felt that there wasn’t sufficient proof to upset the on-field choice and grant the spot-kick.
In any case, I believe that despite the fact that there was restricted time for Pieters to respond, with his arm plainly broadened away from his body and making himself greater he ran a tremendous danger, and I would not have been astounded if a punishment had been granted.

먹중소 먹튀중개소 토토사이트 먹튀검증 온라인카지노 먹튀검증사이트 안전놀이터 먹튀사이트 검증사이트

답글 남기기

아래 항목을 채우거나 오른쪽 아이콘 중 하나를 클릭하여 로그 인 하세요:

WordPress.com 로고

WordPress.com의 계정을 사용하여 댓글을 남깁니다. 로그아웃 /  변경 )

Google photo

Google의 계정을 사용하여 댓글을 남깁니다. 로그아웃 /  변경 )

Twitter 사진

Twitter의 계정을 사용하여 댓글을 남깁니다. 로그아웃 /  변경 )

Facebook 사진

Facebook의 계정을 사용하여 댓글을 남깁니다. 로그아웃 /  변경 )

%s에 연결하는 중